|
|
PS3 Media Server 1.52.1
Submitted by tbag; April 07, 2012
Keeping up with the updates Subjunk has announced another update for his PS3 Media Server bringing it to version 1.52.1 and available to both Windows and Linux users. Mac users will have to wait for their version. For those of you are not familiar with the PS3 Media Server, it allows you stream media from your computer to your PS3 Via your home network. Not much realy is in this update aside form some cleaning up of code and the addition of some languages. For the full list of changes have a read below.
Changelog:
- Updated MPlayer to SB29 which fixes AC3 audio sync
- Allow JRE 6 instead of just JRE 7
- Language updates:
- added Turkish (thanks, BrYaNT!)
- updated Bulgarian (thanks, JORDITO!)
- updated Catalan (thanks, aseques!)
- updated Czech (thanks, valib!)
- updated English labels
- Reading genre from media (thanks, nielsb!)
Tags: Linux, media server, PS3 Hacks, subjunk, windows
|
|
CREATE ACCOUNT NOW TO POST COMMENTS!
Why create an account on the Dashhacks network? Because being logged in has its privileges! • COMMENTS! Only logged in users comments go live without waiting for moderator approval! • No video! The video ad in the upper right doesn't interrupt you on all pages! • Customize your profile! Flaunt your xBox Live & PSN gamertags! • It's FREE and it's EASY! And one login works for all of the Dashhacks review sites! So what are you waiting for?
Go to the TOP RIGHT of the page and LOGIN or click REGISTER!
| ||
Comments
Anyone else suffered from AVG saying PSM.exe contains Mailware virus 4* threat?
Reply
So... this might sound fake... but I've been doing LOTS of research on the theory behind RSA and ECDSA...
The way it works, it seems slightly flawed... if we are able to pull out the original hash (which I think is SHA-1), why can't we *cheat* the system? There are two ways I see at the moment, and I'm workin' on a third. If we take the original hash (actual value is irrelevent), then we forge a signature as a duplicate, then use 1 as the public number, that *should* work, right? Since anything times 1 (or raised to the first power) is itself? Or forge the signature as a 1 (technically 000000000000000 00001), then place the public number as zero, since anything raised to the 0 power is one?
What the actual key is wouldn't matter... size or value... am I on to anything here?
The 3rd way, I'm keeping to myself until I work on it a bit more... but it involves actually doing (a portion of) the algorithm backwards... we'll see how these two ideas pan before I release the third.
Reply
yep all but 1.50
Reply